Course Overview
The ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level (CTFL) v4.0 course is your gateway to advancing your software testing career. This fully accredited programme provides a solid foundation in software testing principles, preparing you for the globally recognised ISTQB CTFL certification. Tailored for professionals in the UK and beyond, it covers best practices aligned with modern methodologies, including Waterfall, Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery.
There is mandatory online pre-course work that must be undertaken prior to attending this course. It is expected that it will take approximately four to five hours to complete. You will be sent full instructions with a link to the online pre course three weeks prior to course commencement. Our e-learning ISTQB Software Testing course includes: This ISTQB Certification course is ideal for: ISTQB® (International Software Testing Qualifications Board) established the globally recognized Certified Tester scheme to: This video will give you an insight in to the new ISTQB Foundation Syllabus, the reasoning behind the syllabus change and the merging of 2 syllabi into one. Enhance your software testing skills and career prospects with our ISTQB Software Testing Foundation course. Join over a million certified testers worldwide and open doors to exciting opportunities in the field of software quality assurance. Why Choose ISTQB Software Testing Certification?
Course Highlights
Important note regarding pre-courseE-Learning Course
Who Should Attend?
About ISTQB and the Certified Tester Scheme
Learn more about the NEW ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level
Invest in Your Future with ISTQB Certification
Lucas Borges Laporta| Software Quality Assurance |Vision-Box –
Really well explain. Angelina was amazing and really careful with the attention to detail, making sure we all understood and comprehend the logic behind the words.
Ashraf Al-Fosaiel| Solution Architect |KPMG –
I like the course and the the supplementary document really helped.
Olivia Burlinson| QA Test Analyst|Total Security Limited –
Very informative and helpful course. All of the areas were covered well and in detail with support to go over more difficult areas as needed. I’d definitely consider taking another course through this provider.
Maria Helena da Silva Machado| Teacher| –
More condensed in the first days, less in the last day.
Orlanjhay| Test Analyst|BOE –
Needs to be more than 3 days so we can have more time to solidify everything
Hollie| Technology Strategy Analyst|KPMG –
Knowledgeable trainer, content was detailed and thorough. Good to have access to past papers with separate answer sheets
Erin Forde| Technology Consultant|KPMG –
The course has been interesting. There has been a lot of new information however Richard has been a brilliant trainer. His teaching style is great, with the use of slides, the whiteboard for more interactive detail, exam questions, and the regular recaps of information which help to piece it all together. From not know anything about testing, i feel comfortable with the foundations and confident with the approaching exam. The course content and information is accessible and detailed.
Felix Chow| Tech Consultant|KPMG UK –
Richard was excellent at guiding us through the course material, pulling real-life examples where possible to keep the audience engaged. His method of delivery was calm and confident while still delivering with enough emotion to keep things interesting, making him one of the best presenters I’ve come across. Well done Richard!
Natalie Fung| Cloud Analyst| –
Good coverage on wide range of test concepts and overlapping with agile delivery practices
Poppy Yip| Technology Consultant|KPMG –
All the concepts were really well explained. Resources were easy to access and really helpful. Personal preference would be to have more interactive learning as struggle to listen and concentrate for such long periods of time (sometimes 2hours at a time).
| | –
Richard was good at articulating concepts and spoke in a clear and concise way. He emphasised the importance of group involvement and discussion
James Robinson Ranger| Analyst |KPMG –
Well presented, liked the intermittent exam questions to test our knowledge
Iman Jaf| Cloud Consultant|KPMG UK –
Course was delivered expertly, with clear information and well-thought out examples. Instructor was warm, personable and willing to answer questions with detail.
Christine Stokes| Software Engineer Lead|Capgemini –
The course has been very informative. It’s been easy to keep focused and highlighted areas I need to spend more time revising and learning.
Xesh Phakathi| Software Engineer|Capgemini –
Very intense but very informative. Trainer took time to explain the more complex stuff. Practice exam questions were also useful in understanding what could have been potentially missed in the training.
Anastasia Dmitrenko| Software engineer|Capgemini –
The course has been very helpful in providing valuable information in such a short time. Even though there is a lot of content to go through, it is easy to understand, which is mainly thanks to Richard and the way he goes through the slides and is able to deliver the content. Very nice, valuable course thank you.
Gary Hull| Senior Developer|Capgemini –
Good course and content. I did find it little hard to concentrate for the longish periods with lots of new material a pace. That’s the nature of a 3 day course I though I suppose. If I was primarily a tester I expect this would be much easier. Still goood though
Ina Toni-Uebari| Software Engineer|Capgemini UK –
The course was well paced and the instructor had clear explanations. I found the exercises and additional resources very helpful.
Makhan Grewal| Software Engineer|Capgemini –
The trainer was knowledgeable and answered questions. The pace of the course was also good.
I liked the fact that when other topics were covered, the trainer gave context.
Tamao Cameron| Test Analyst|Capgemini –
The course was very thorough but easy to follow along with. Richard made sure that everyone understood what was being conveyed before progressing and was knowledgeable too. It feels like a basic understanding of testing was important to the course as terminology used was implied as standard.