Book online today or if you need any assistance or help
choosing the right course for you, please call our team on 08000 199337 and
we will help point you in the right direction.
In today’s fast-paced Agile software development environment, ensuring high-quality software requires skilled professionals who understand Agile Testing principles, methodologies, and best practices. The ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester (CT-AT) certification provides a solid foundation for test professionals working in Agile teams, equipping them with the skills necessary to apply testing strategies in Agile projects.
Delivered by experienced agile testing practitioner
Practical, group-based exercises
Learn techniques such as TDD, BDD, exploratory testing
Understand agile test roles, methods, and ceremonies
Suitable for testers, scrum masters, and developers
Fully accredited, exam fee included
Why you should attend
Gain a deeper understanding of agile principles and how testing fits in
Be equipped to contribute more effectively to agile teams
Learn skills that improve team communication, testing efficiency, and product quality
Add a recognised qualification to your CV to boost career opportunities
Get practical knowledge you can use immediately in real projects
Be prepared to pass the ISTQB agile tester certification exam
Who should attend
This course is ideal for:
Testers who already hold the ISTQB Foundation Certificate (CTFL)
Test professionals moving into agile projects
Scrum masters and product owners wanting to understand testing
Developers and business analysts working closely with testers
Anyone involved in agile software delivery wanting to formalise their knowledge
Watch our latest webinar
Want to learn more before enrolling? Our expert-led ISTQB Agile Tester Webinar offers valuable insights into the course content, exam structure, and real-world Agile testing practices. Click here to watch our webinar here
About ISTQB and the certified tester scheme
The International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB) is a globally recognised body that defines professional certifications for software testers.
The Certified Tester scheme is the most widely adopted qualification program for software testing professionals. It consists of Foundation, Advanced, and Specialist levels.
The Agile Tester (CTFL‑AT) is a specialist extension to the foundation level, specifically designed to address the need for agile-compatible testing practices. It is internationally recognised and trusted by employers worldwide.
Note that it is recommended that you attend an accredited training course run by an accredited training provider, as the overall exam pass rates are notably higher for candidates attending such courses.
Exam
To qualify as an internationally-recognised ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester and be issued with an ISTQB® Agile Foundation Extension Level Certificate, delegates must successfully pass the exam administered by the relevant national board or examination provider.
The exam will be taken on the afternoon of the last day of the course.
The examination consists of a one-hour exam with 40 multiple choice questions.
It will be a ‘closed book’ examination i.e. no notes or books will be allowed into the examination room.
Duration of 60 minutes (or 75 minutes for candidates taking examinations that are not in their native language). The pass mark is 65% (26 out of 40).
Exam is included in the price
Learning objectives
After successfully completing the course and passing the exam, delegates should be able to demonstrate the following business-based outcomes:
Collaborate in a cross-functional Agile team being familiar with principles and basic practices of Agile software development.
Adapt existing testing experience and knowledge to Agile values and principles.
Support the Agile team in planning test-related activities.
Apply relevant methods and techniques for testing in an Agile project.
Assist the Agile team in test automation activities.
Assist business stakeholders in defining understandable and testable user stories, scenarios, requirements and acceptance criteria as appropriate.
Work and share information with other team members using effective communication styles and channels.
In general, a Certified Tester Foundation Level – Agile Tester is expected to have acquired the necessary skills to working effectively within an Agile team and environment.
In addition, Foundation level Agile Testers should be able to demonstrate their skills in the following areas once they have completed the course and passed the exam:
The fundamentals of Agile Software Development
The different agile approaches
The Differences between Testing in Traditional and Agile Approaches
Testing in Agile Projects
Roles and skills of a tester in Agile Projects
Agile testing techniques and methods
Assess product quality risks within an Agile project
Estimate testing effort based on iteration content and quality risks
Tools in Agile Projects
ISTQB Agile Tester syllabus
FAQs
What is the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation Course?
The ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation Course is a specialised certification designed for testing professionals who wish to understand the fundamentals of Agile methodologies in software testing. It is tailored for testers, test analysts, test engineers, test consultants, test managers, and anyone involved in Agile projects
Are there any pre-requisites for enrolling in the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation Course?
Yes, to enrol in the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation Course, candidates must hold the Certified Tester Foundation Level (CTFL) certificate. This ensures that all participants have a foundational understanding of software testing principles before advancing to Agile-specific practices
What topics are covered in the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation Course?
The course covers a range of topics essential for Agile testing, including the principles and practices of Agile software development, Agile testing methods and techniques, the role of the tester in an Agile team, and collaboration in cross-functional teams, among others.
How is the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation exam structured, and what is the passing score?
The exam consists of 40 multiple-choice questions, with a 60-minute time limit. Candidates must achieve a grade of 65% or better to pass. Non-native English speakers may qualify for an extended-time exam, receiving 25% more time.
What are the benefits of becoming ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation certified?
Becoming certified demonstrates a professional’s knowledge and commitment to Agile testing principles and practices. It enhances their ability to work effectively within Agile teams, supports career advancement, and increases their marketability in the job market
What are the options for taking the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation exam?
The exam can be taken online from home or office, or physically at a testing centre. The choice depends on the candidate's preference and the options available from the chosen accredited exam provider
What certifications can I pursue after obtaining the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation certification?
After obtaining the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation certification, candidates can pursue further certifications in the Agile stream, such as Agile Technical Tester, or explore other areas of specialisation within the ISTQB certification scheme
Is it necessary to take a course before attempting the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation exam?
While it is not mandatory to take a course, many candidates find it helpful for quick preparation or as a way to ensure comprehensive coverage of the exam material. TSG Training offer various course formats including classroom, virtual, and e-learning
Can I take the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation exam from home using remote proctoring services?
Yes, candidates have the option to take the exam from home using remote proctoring services offered by TSG Training. This allows for flexibility and convenience, enabling candidates to choose the best time and setting for their exam
How can I register for the ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation course and exam?
Decide on the Delivery Method: Begin by selecting your preferred mode of learning. You have the option to choose between virtual (online) courses or traditional, in-person classroom courses. Consider your learning preferences, schedule, and location to make the best decision for your needs.
Select the Exam Format: After deciding on your course delivery method, choose the format of the exam you wish to take.
The ISTQB Agile Tester Foundation exam is typically available in both online and paper-based formats. Your choice might depend on the availability, convenience, or your comfort with test-taking environments.
Complete the Payment: Once you have made your selections, proceed to payment. You can pay for the course and the examination fee using various methods, including credit card, bank transfer, or a purchase order. Ensure that you have all the necessary information and authorisation if using a purchase order or bank transfer.
142 reviews for ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester (CTFL-AT)
Rated 5 out of 5
Ian Parsons | QA Test Analyst | Principality Building Society –
Surprised as to the content – a lot of focus on the fundamentals and machinations of Agile as opposed to Agile testing, but suppose I would have realised that had I thoroughly checked the syllabus first. Pitched at a good level given the range of agile experience in the training group. Not overly happy with the wording/rationale for some of the sample exam questions.
Rated 5 out of 5
Byron Phillips | QA | Principality Building Society –
Course is good and a lot to learn, what does concern me is that some of the exam questions are intended to catch you out rather than based on the learning material
Rated 5 out of 5
Dylan Whyte | QA Lead | Jagex –
John is a great trainer, he is good at explaining and is always happy to answer questions. _x000D_
_x000D_
My problems are with the TSG mock exam questions. I’m dyslexic and a good 6/36 requires having an intimate understanding of the nuances of the English language to decipher. I understand that some of the questions are supposed to be tricky but they are way different to the actual exam from my experience. I think the training exam is a red herring that adds unnecessary stress to an already information heavy training course. I would like to be able to understand the question and apply my knowledge instead of tripping up due to the sheer complexity and long-winded unhelpful questions. It’s demoralising and makes me feel don’t understand anything. The majority of the time, if the question is re-worded I can answer the question and get it right with no issues. _x000D_
_x000D_
I would not have an issue if the questions were long but concise but there are lots of connecting words and double negatives that create a labyrinth of potential misinterpretations._x000D_
_x000D_
I just believe the jumping through hoops to try understand a question is pointless and unnecessary. _x000D_
_x000D_
Sorry for my very cynical feedback but this is how I feel. _x000D_
_x000D_
Just a heads up about this form, you can tick all the options in the “how would you rate your trainer.”_x000D_
_x000D_
Cheers,
Rated 4 out of 5
Connor Lines | QA Engineer | Jagex –
Trainer was pleasant and knowledgeable on the subject matter. Course material was covered at a good rate. A number of the questions in the sample exam material were poorly phrased, our trainer even agreed they would be unlikely to appears as phrased in a real exam. This made the sample questions, and the time take to review them feel extremely counter productive.
Rated 4 out of 5
Graeme Churchman | Junior SDET | Jagex –
Information was clear, but did feel like some parts were skipped over more than others (possibly as they are less important / unlikely to be in the exam). I would have liked to do more practice questions (5-10) at the end of each section as I find this helps me cement the learning that just took place, rather than doing one or two questions along with all others at the end._x000D_
_x000D_
I would have liked a little more exam technique training, or advice on the sort of questions that would have been asked (this could have been covered by the above additional practice questions)._x000D_
_x000D_
I was also disappointed that the practice questions were not like the exam questions, either not in the same format (select multiple answers) or wouldn’t have been selected for the exam as they didn’t have enough context._x000D_
_x000D_
Finally John himself was very friendly and I would do training with him again, though I have to admit I did find it quite difficult to read his handwriting some times!
Rated 4 out of 5
Katie Stanford | Junior QA Analysis | Jagex –
I enjoyed the course, considering it was digital and not in a classroom which i personally prefer. Trainer was very helpful. Only this is please avoid having so many ‘need more context’ questions in sample papers, as they dont help and just make me personally feel dumb.
Rated 5 out of 5
Philip Wright | Test Engineer | Principality Building Society –
Enjoyed the course but the exam questions I found could be very open to interpretation (Cases being ‘BEST’ or ‘MOST LIKELY’).
Rated 4 out of 5
Nathan Grabham | Test Engineer | Principality –
Good information although its too much to digest in just two days.
Rated 4 out of 5
Robert Macdonald | Software Test Apprentice | IBM –
I thought it felt more like a second ISTQB course rather than a Agile course, but either way enjoyed it and felt like I learnt a lot from it._x000D_
_x000D_
I think to improve, it would be really helpful just to have a final slide with the definitions of some of the key words/topics and maybe summarize the main differences between similar topics (like release and iteration charts)
Rated 5 out of 5
Scott Newberry | Test Team Lead | IDBS –
Engaging, thought-provoking presentation of various aspects of security testing
Rated 5 out of 5
Saskia Cope | Test Lead | Capgemini –
Very informative, each slide described in detail to support with the exam questions. Would be good to go through more exam questions during the course and perhaps less exercises.
Rated 4 out of 5
Simon Wright | Programme Test Manager | Capgemini –
The course content was good, unfortunately it felt like it was designed for a classroom delivery rather than online and this was difficult as things that would probably have been really good discussions in a classroom did not transpire to be so good online.
Rated 5 out of 5
Philip White | QA Analyst | Jagex –
The course was well paced, with questions intermittently breaking up sections of listening, confirming that the information conveyed was taken in and gave opportunity to question anything that may not have been understood._x000D_
_x000D_
Being an online course, I found it very uncomfortable that neither the attendees nor the trainer had cameras on, as I couldn’t read body language or get other visual cues to inform when and where I could or should speak._x000D_
_x000D_
Regular breaks were appreciated as they allowed some space for a bit of a mental refresh and time away from a screen.
Rated 5 out of 5
Kristina Savciuk | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Course was great!
Rated 5 out of 5
Andrew Churcher | Senior QA Engineer | Jagex –
The hand written notes could be difficult to read at times, would suggest a thinner tip on the pen.
Rated 5 out of 5
steph scanlon | Principal QA Analyst | Jagex –
John is a fantastic trainer, if only I had John for my foundation course many moons ago! Everything on the course was fully explained to us in a way the group could understand and no question felt “stupid”. _x000D_
_x000D_
I hope to have John training me in future courses as I now feel more ready to take on my exam.
Rated 5 out of 5
Vytautas Januskevicius | QA Analyst | Jagex –
John was great at explaining the course, good and informative. Great at explaining exam questions.
Rated 5 out of 5
Luke Goodridge | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Very well done, was clear on all aspects, ready for my exam
Rated 5 out of 5
Fola Olagunju | Senior Test Analyst |WTC –
Well rounded course with good explanations to go with each slide
Rated 5 out of 5
Philippa Hodge | Automation Tester |WTC –
Very hard to deliver this online so John did a fine job of giving us what we need to hopefully pass the exam.
Online Exams The remote web proctor solution allows you to take your exams online, using a webcam, microphone and a stable internet connection. You can schedule your exam in advance, at a date and time of your choice. At the agreed time you will connect with a proctor who will invigilate your exam live. View More info here https://tinyurl.com/mr22kry9
A Pearson VUE exam voucher A pearson VUE exam voucher enables you to book and sit your exam at your local Pearson VUE testing centre at a time and date convenient to you. Pearson VUE centres are worldwide, and you will be able to choose the closest testing centre to you. View More info here https://tinyurl.com/2mhn5ust
E-learning is s training, learning, or education delivered online through a computer or any other digital device, where you can work through the course at your own pace.
If you are attending a classroom course, then this will be taken at our many training centres within the UK. Our London location is Minories London EC3N 1BJ
Virtual classroom is like being in a classroom where students gather, except you will be in your home, office, or other place of your choice.
Pass Protect, offered by TSG Training, is a valuable option for those concerned about the possibility of not passing their exam on the first attempt. It acts like an insurance policy, allowing you to resit your exam at a significantly reduced rate. Pass Protect covers one resit per exam purchased, so you don’t have to worry about the cost of an additional attempt if you don’t pass initially.
In today’s fast-paced Agile software development environment, ensuring high-quality software requires skilled professionals who understand Agile Testing principles, methodologies, and best practices. The ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester (CT-AT) certification provides a solid foundation for test professionals working in Agile teams, equipping them with the skills necessary to apply testing strategies in Agile projects. 
Ian Parsons | QA Test Analyst | Principality Building Society –
Surprised as to the content – a lot of focus on the fundamentals and machinations of Agile as opposed to Agile testing, but suppose I would have realised that had I thoroughly checked the syllabus first. Pitched at a good level given the range of agile experience in the training group. Not overly happy with the wording/rationale for some of the sample exam questions.
Byron Phillips | QA | Principality Building Society –
Course is good and a lot to learn, what does concern me is that some of the exam questions are intended to catch you out rather than based on the learning material
Dylan Whyte | QA Lead | Jagex –
John is a great trainer, he is good at explaining and is always happy to answer questions. _x000D_
_x000D_
My problems are with the TSG mock exam questions. I’m dyslexic and a good 6/36 requires having an intimate understanding of the nuances of the English language to decipher. I understand that some of the questions are supposed to be tricky but they are way different to the actual exam from my experience. I think the training exam is a red herring that adds unnecessary stress to an already information heavy training course. I would like to be able to understand the question and apply my knowledge instead of tripping up due to the sheer complexity and long-winded unhelpful questions. It’s demoralising and makes me feel don’t understand anything. The majority of the time, if the question is re-worded I can answer the question and get it right with no issues. _x000D_
_x000D_
I would not have an issue if the questions were long but concise but there are lots of connecting words and double negatives that create a labyrinth of potential misinterpretations._x000D_
_x000D_
I just believe the jumping through hoops to try understand a question is pointless and unnecessary. _x000D_
_x000D_
Sorry for my very cynical feedback but this is how I feel. _x000D_
_x000D_
Just a heads up about this form, you can tick all the options in the “how would you rate your trainer.”_x000D_
_x000D_
Cheers,
Connor Lines | QA Engineer | Jagex –
Trainer was pleasant and knowledgeable on the subject matter. Course material was covered at a good rate. A number of the questions in the sample exam material were poorly phrased, our trainer even agreed they would be unlikely to appears as phrased in a real exam. This made the sample questions, and the time take to review them feel extremely counter productive.
Graeme Churchman | Junior SDET | Jagex –
Information was clear, but did feel like some parts were skipped over more than others (possibly as they are less important / unlikely to be in the exam). I would have liked to do more practice questions (5-10) at the end of each section as I find this helps me cement the learning that just took place, rather than doing one or two questions along with all others at the end._x000D_
_x000D_
I would have liked a little more exam technique training, or advice on the sort of questions that would have been asked (this could have been covered by the above additional practice questions)._x000D_
_x000D_
I was also disappointed that the practice questions were not like the exam questions, either not in the same format (select multiple answers) or wouldn’t have been selected for the exam as they didn’t have enough context._x000D_
_x000D_
Finally John himself was very friendly and I would do training with him again, though I have to admit I did find it quite difficult to read his handwriting some times!
Katie Stanford | Junior QA Analysis | Jagex –
I enjoyed the course, considering it was digital and not in a classroom which i personally prefer. Trainer was very helpful. Only this is please avoid having so many ‘need more context’ questions in sample papers, as they dont help and just make me personally feel dumb.
Philip Wright | Test Engineer | Principality Building Society –
Enjoyed the course but the exam questions I found could be very open to interpretation (Cases being ‘BEST’ or ‘MOST LIKELY’).
Nathan Grabham | Test Engineer | Principality –
Good information although its too much to digest in just two days.
Robert Macdonald | Software Test Apprentice | IBM –
I thought it felt more like a second ISTQB course rather than a Agile course, but either way enjoyed it and felt like I learnt a lot from it._x000D_
_x000D_
I think to improve, it would be really helpful just to have a final slide with the definitions of some of the key words/topics and maybe summarize the main differences between similar topics (like release and iteration charts)
Scott Newberry | Test Team Lead | IDBS –
Engaging, thought-provoking presentation of various aspects of security testing
Saskia Cope | Test Lead | Capgemini –
Very informative, each slide described in detail to support with the exam questions. Would be good to go through more exam questions during the course and perhaps less exercises.
Simon Wright | Programme Test Manager | Capgemini –
The course content was good, unfortunately it felt like it was designed for a classroom delivery rather than online and this was difficult as things that would probably have been really good discussions in a classroom did not transpire to be so good online.
Philip White | QA Analyst | Jagex –
The course was well paced, with questions intermittently breaking up sections of listening, confirming that the information conveyed was taken in and gave opportunity to question anything that may not have been understood._x000D_
_x000D_
Being an online course, I found it very uncomfortable that neither the attendees nor the trainer had cameras on, as I couldn’t read body language or get other visual cues to inform when and where I could or should speak._x000D_
_x000D_
Regular breaks were appreciated as they allowed some space for a bit of a mental refresh and time away from a screen.
Kristina Savciuk | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Course was great!
Andrew Churcher | Senior QA Engineer | Jagex –
The hand written notes could be difficult to read at times, would suggest a thinner tip on the pen.
steph scanlon | Principal QA Analyst | Jagex –
John is a fantastic trainer, if only I had John for my foundation course many moons ago! Everything on the course was fully explained to us in a way the group could understand and no question felt “stupid”. _x000D_
_x000D_
I hope to have John training me in future courses as I now feel more ready to take on my exam.
Vytautas Januskevicius | QA Analyst | Jagex –
John was great at explaining the course, good and informative. Great at explaining exam questions.
Luke Goodridge | QA Analyst | Jagex –
Very well done, was clear on all aspects, ready for my exam
Fola Olagunju | Senior Test Analyst |WTC –
Well rounded course with good explanations to go with each slide
Philippa Hodge | Automation Tester |WTC –
Very hard to deliver this online so John did a fine job of giving us what we need to hopefully pass the exam.